It is often argued by some that there should be a limit to how people make noise, while others said they should make noise as they want. In my opinion, I completely believe that by regulating the amount of noise made by individuals, it will significantly reduce the various problems of noise pollution.
Many think the number of people noise should be restricted, and I agree. This is because quite a lot of unnecessary noise pollutants are being released to the environment. For instance, bus drivers in the developing nations, might impatiently honk their buses during a traffic congestion in an attempt to cause alert other cars in front of them, which can cause discomfort. Another obvious example is that people turn their speakers to the maximum level while listening to their favorite music in an attempt to keep their body and soul together after a hectic day at work or during the weekends. Thus, these forms of pollutants can lead to hearing impairment and deafness, which can have a great burden on the health budget of a country. Hence, there should be a strict control of noise making.
On the other hand, there are others who said that people should freely make noise. In every nation, freedom of speech remains a fundamental human right. As long as the noise from hosting parties or dogs barking does not cause discomfort to the neighbours and the immediate surroundings, they should be allowed to do as they wish. To illustrate this point, some people always wish to enjoy their successes in a quite elaborate way by playing raucous music, shouting at the top of their voices or even playing loud instruments. Similarly, they may also react in an identical manner while grieving the loss of a family member. Thus, their human right should be unjeopardized.
In conclusion, while people may have contrasting opinions regarding how much noise is made. I think strict laws should be enacted to prevent the immediate and future generations from becoming deaf.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that it is better for a country s economy for people to spend money while others believe that it would be better for people to save money Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development 39
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 92
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I agree. This is because quite a lot of unnecessary noise pollutants are being r...
^^
Line 6, column 558, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an identical manner" with adverb for "identical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ruments. Similarly, they may also react in an identical manner while grieving the loss of a family mem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94311377246 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64310895653 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571856287425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5243811267 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501903721392 0.244688304435 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153127909065 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134554669197 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306316939421 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983377396015 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I agree. This is because quite a lot of unnecessary noise pollutants are being r...
^^
Line 6, column 558, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an identical manner" with adverb for "identical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ruments. Similarly, they may also react in an identical manner while grieving the loss of a family mem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94311377246 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64310895653 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571856287425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5243811267 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501903721392 0.244688304435 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153127909065 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134554669197 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306316939421 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983377396015 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.