It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishments should parents and teachers should be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Some people assert that learning the differences between right and wrong at an early age is essential to children and this can be achieved by imposing proper punishments which help them to learn this distinction. I completely agree with the above claim and this essay will elaborate on this topic with the following compelling reasons.
To begin with, teaching the children about the variances between good and bad things at an early phase can make them grow independent and taking better decisions about their life. Children are good imitators. They do not have enough knowledge on treating what is right and which is not. They do emulate the things and actions which they usually observe around them. They eventually try to perform the same without thinking twice, whether it is a positive or negative development. For example, a child who was born to well-disciplined parents may impose the same habits on their daily activities. Consequently, they play a crucial role in developing a good society by learning ethics, moral values, and social manners.
However, children with inappropriate minds should treat by inducing some strict and reasonable punishments to teach them obedience. Punishments play a key role in enhancing the personality of a child. They turn them into decent professionals. It is the primary obligation of all parents and teachers to guide their students or children on the right path at the beginning stages of life. Constructive and affectionate punishments are probably more fruitful than harsh ones. To illustrate this, a misbehaved child may learn things more easily by treating them with gentle and kind gestures rather than hitting them with tools and rods. Some positive things include assigning household chores, giving more homework, not buying them wanted things, and reducing their playing time are more affectionate ways to teach them good behavior at the initial stages.
To recapitulate it, as it stands now, aiding the youngsters or young living beings in choosing the right paths between correct and wrong at the first stages will make them learn social behavior, ethics, and moral values that are pivotal factors and this can be accomplished by inculcating probable punishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 68
- the chart below gives the information on ages of population in Italy and Yemen in 2000 and its projections in 2050 84
- The charts below shows the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in the year 2000 and 2010 73
- The graph below gives information from 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The first shows how the energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which results from its energy use 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...which they usually observe around them. They eventually try to perform the same with...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, so, well, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27247191011 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77612659407 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9749465574 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.411764706 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358528618799 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997476103135 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927766995609 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223249545277 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115979384405 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...which they usually observe around them. They eventually try to perform the same with...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, so, well, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27247191011 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77612659407 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9749465574 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.411764706 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358528618799 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997476103135 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927766995609 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223249545277 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115979384405 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.