It is important to have huge public spaces like parks and squares in towns and cities. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement?
There has been some discussion about the existence and the need of parks and squares in towns and cities. While many people believe that these open premises are essential, others insist that these places can be useless, hence they must be converted to practical purposes. In my opinion, despite the voices against the parks and public place existence, I still believe in the great value of those to both cities and civilians.
From my standpoint, I still harbor a concern that public spaces such as squares have positive effects on our daily life. First of all, these places are always considered as the heart of cities where people can organize family meetings and do many outdoor activities in their leisure time. Beside that the creation of parks or squares comes from ideas that can provide ideal places for children and their parents to have a quality time after a hectic daily schedule. The increasing pollution in cities is a cause of great concern for the government and the citizens and places like parks and squares often provide relaxation to the old people. Moreover, those public spaces also abstract tourists because of the historical value behind their creation, which can afford to the government a new way of industry. For instance, the Unification Park which is a symbol of peace, stability, and postwar development of Hanoi. As a result, it is absolutely imperative to conserve them for the future generations.
On the other hand, due to globalization and urbanization, cities are getting crowded and lack places to build public and commercial centres. In detaily described, a new transportation system coming to the areas required a large space to build and operate. Take one example, New York was planned nearly 200 years ago and the roads in the city were small and narrow which were built only for carts not cars or even buses. Later, NY authorities converted many historical parks and gardens into parking stations and highways. Consequently, this transformation was publicly criticized by civilians and other town planners. Therefore, destroying parks and other public spaces for current benefits is not the solution for space management in cities .
To conclude, big public grounds have many benefits to our daily life, especially for the future generations. Cities are facing a lot of pressure to develop a substantial infrastructure for the growing population, but this cannot be allowed at the cost of parks and squares, hence, it is completely indispensable to have huge public grounds in every city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | Hoangquan0912 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Hoangquan0912 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Hoangquan0912 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | code6127 | 67 | view |
- It is important to have huge public spaces like parks and squares in towns and cities Do you agree or disagree with the given statement 78
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- It is important to have huge public spaces like parks and squares in towns and cities Do you agree or disagree with the given statement 78
- Some people think that young people should follow the traditions of their society There however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 69
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... solution for space management in cities . To conclude, big public grounds have ...
^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have huge public grounds in every city.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10843373494 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74279583529 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561445783133 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0856924977 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24795061991 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778199513396 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478033469174 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146450748805 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256466130228 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.