all towns and cities should have large public spaces
It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares
and parks. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that the construction of new public spaces such as squares and parks is very crucial. While the presence of these projects could bring about several benefits, I would argue that all towns and cities do not have to build large public spaces.
To begin with, constructing public spaces has many advantages. First, since public spaces are usually equipped with an abundance of sport facilities, this would stimulate physical activities of rural residents who usually have sedentary lifestyles. Consequently, there would be remarkable enhancements in both their mental and physical health. An excellent example of this is Nguyen Hue square in Ho Chi Minh city. This public space attracts not only hundreds of visitors a day but also a considerable number of people going there daily for physical excises. Second, since most tourists are enticed by locations that offer high-quality public places, cities which invest money in building recreational spaces for the public are likely to witness growths in the quantity of tourists. As a result, the economies of these cities would be significantly boosted.
However, I think that the government should not force all towns and cities to build parks and squares. Firstly, metropolis like Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city are currently facing shortages of land which result from overpopulation. Therefore, finding a land spacious enough to construct recreational places for the public appears to be a challenge. The city authorities might decide to demolish plenty of houses in order to make room for public places, which makes many people lose their houses. Secondly, since constructing and maintaining these places require a great amount of money, cities which have weak financial conditions could encounter imbalances in budget for other sectors. If city officials decide not to build these places, more money would be invested into other urgent needs such as medical care, drainage system and unemployment.
In conclusion, while I recognize that building public spaces is important, I strongly believe that the construction of these places should be based on the current situation of each town and each city
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-03 | hitakshi patel | view | |
| 2022-01-01 | joshjaat | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | LEEANHTUAN | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Hoangquan0912 | 78 | view |
- all towns and cities should have large public spaces 78
- Some people think that robot technology is very important for our future Some others believe that robots are dangerous invention and have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give opinion 78
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 73
- It is important to have huge public spaces like parks and squares in towns and cities Do you agree or disagree with the given statement 78
- Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are in great needs while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country Discuss both views and give your own opinio 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is important for all towns and cities...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28142076503 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73027935085 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554644808743 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7546443315 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.388888889 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428752808875 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135122870873 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138813696823 0.0667982634062 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268283246305 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183043651971 0.056905535591 322% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.