It is more important for school children to learn about their local history rather than world history. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

It is more important for school children to learn about their local history rather than world history. Do you agree or disagree?

It is suggested that school children should only study local history instead of the history of other countries. I disagree with this statement because each focus brings students unique advantages.

Obviously, it is necessary for school children to study the history of their own country. The primary reason is that understanding their past generations’ behaviour and thoughts can inspire children to relate their current life to their ancestors’ experiences, deepening their sense of belonging to the nation and enhancing national identity. What is more, this strong connection to one’s own roots contributes to a sense of national pride so that children are likely to develop into responsible citizens who are concerned about the well-being of their society and willing to follow the policies implemented by their government. Governments will find it easy to manage the public and control crime rates.

However, school children should also study foreign history. For one thing, as every country has stereotypical views and shortcomings, if children were to only study local history, their mind and potential to succeed would be restricted. In contrast, if they can be exposed to world history, children will learn new ways to approach tasks, inspiring them to think outside the box, thereby cultivating creative thinking. Furthermore, this creativity help them generate innovative ideas and work productively in the future. As a result, the number and the quality of capable workers will increase, resulting in economic growth.

As discussed above, as local and foreign history bring school children different benefits, both of them are worth of studying.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-19 Frank Chen 78 view
Essays by user Frank Chen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould only study local history instead of the history of other countries. I disagr...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in contrast, as a result, for one thing, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57421875 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94473997668 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1299671181 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298697802244 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102773551809 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751242430305 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16881633511 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146697199906 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.