It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that book lovers are believed to be more imaginative and linguistically proficient than those who watch television. Personally, I completely agree with this point of view.
There are two main reasons why individuals who read books for enjoyment are considered to have great creativity and linguistic abilities. One reason is that books are usually filled with texts, so readers have to create for themselves a whole new world where there are characters with actions and emotions, contexts, and issues placed in them. They can also develop their language skills and widen their knowledge while reading a certain type of book such as Atomic Habits if they are into the self-love genre, or Bound by Honour in case they love the romance type. In these two specific books, it has a plot with a wide range of words specialized in that genre and it not only helps those who are trying to learn a new language but learners can also bring the characters' replies into daily conversations to make it sounds more natural. Furthermore, the more they read the more curious and creative they are since the storyline tends to be more complex and thrilling later on, therefore, bibliophiles need to use their imagination and sometimes recall a few of their memories in order to make a suitable scene.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I think that watching TV can also bring some advantages to people as it is more appealing and entertaining than books and a good way to relax. Firstly, viewers have access to a huge variety of entertainment channels and it brings the best comedians, musicians and actors into our homes with just a few buttons. Secondly, programs can also be informative and educational. New coverage makes the public aware of events around the world and documents can make learning more interesting. Take National Geographic, for example, they provide information about the natural world and suggest solutions to tackle the extinction problem of some creatures, which gives students enjoyment and motivation in learning this subject at school.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that bookworms are believed to have a fantastic imagination and are linguistically skilled. However, I could not lower the value of watching TV, especially when people are stressed because of work in this modern world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-07 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | dinhthu05 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 78
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future 84
- When designing a building the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them Education and training are better To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries in order to make a suitable scene. Apart from the practical benefits expres...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08439897698 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78979486173 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4004557 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9285714286 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236099674845 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789749293941 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717979327588 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157759812363 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551215600703 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.