It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
These days children have been encouraged to get to know working in farmlands, especially rural areas. I opine that however, there is a compelling reason to support this idea, the disadvantages of such situations should also be taken into consideration.
The majority who advocate the idea of learning farming-skills point out that such abilities are named as basic requirements of each person. As a matter of fact, each individual needs to be taught how to survive under any circumstances without the other’s assistance. For instance, the European children have been provided with the full breadth of opportunities to attend in some workshops to be educated the crucial needs of the human to safeguard a sustainable life in the future. Consequently, with regard to the actual benefits of these skills, it is reported to have been taught in most developed countries recently.
Nevertheless, there are some significant drawbacks which are advised to be discussed, one of which is that the effect of technology in today’s life makes these educations useless. To some extent, with the advancement of technology, most of the rural activities have been done by robots so such skills are not observed as a fundamental requirement for children. Therefore, the efficient strategy for the youngsters can be listed down as learning the newest technological gadgets. In more detail, children have not spent too much time and energy on learning some monotonous tasks done by computers. In contrast, if children strive hard to be educated in modern issues, they are capable of developing the quality of life for the next generation.
To sum up, despite the benefits of learning the basic requirement of life for humanity, there are some disadvantages that need to be addressed. In my point of view, modern topics are supposed to be mentioned in children's courses as they play a critical role in fostering prosperity in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | yufdtrdfyt | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, as a matter of fact, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18327974277 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06168088607 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565916398714 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3293882949 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100259326781 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385052540372 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0231599031836 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676199257471 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129098277112 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.