Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?
What is your opinion on that?
There is no denying that making a selection of a manager among men and women always would be challenging. In recent years the majority of high-powered job positions have been dedicating to men. In my point of view, it is the government’s responsibility to allocate such jobs to the number of women.
To begin with, running the high-level jobs by women has some symptoms, one of which is that equal opportunity has given to all individuals. This is because of the fact that women have the same right as men in order to education, work, and marriage. To some extent, the proportion of abilities that women put through these jobs are slightly much more than men. For instance, a woman who runs an economical research department has shown to own better affordability for concerns, which might be happened there, are being dealt with. In contrast, if women did not possess such chances, they would become depressed and lose their self-confidence.
In addition, beside the equal chances, I would claim that the nature of some jobs is well-matched to women. A case in a point can be found when a person is likely to make a decision about a manager of high schools or nursing homes, where the elderly is looked after. If this person gives a man this occasion to run ahead, he will find it an unsolved-problem to struggle with the children. As a result, the government should take a priority to allocate such jobs to women.
To sum up, the two significant reasons for participating in the high-powered jobs as women are the same abilities of women compared to men and the type of some jobs like working in kindergarten that might be seen better fit for women to be a boss. In my opinion, the government is supposed to provide a great number of such jobs for women to present a sustainable future, and will not hurt the women’s self-respect and pride.
- Some think that climate change reforms will negatively affect business Others feel they are an opportunity for businesses 73
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some think that it is more important for children to engage in outdoor activities instead of playing videogames 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some think scientists should be allowed to send messages into space to communicate with other life forms while others believe this is too dangerous Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...y has given to all individuals. This is because of the fact that women have the same right as men in ord...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69538461538 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88325260117 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541538461538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8279066945 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357630072402 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127077644659 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749502676237 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234288980593 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589483543148 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.