It is widely believed that children of different levels of intelligence should be taught together while others thin that more intelligent children should be taught separately. Discuss and present your own opinion.
These days, there are many arguments regarding how to educate students of different ability levels. While some people claim that intellectually talented children should be grouped and taught isolated from regular students, I am of the opinion that a mixed-ability class would be a better choice.
On the one hand, the idea of teaching gifted students in a separate class may be feasible to some extent. These students are able to quickly obtain basic knowledge and thus, moving on to acquire knowledge at a higher level. When being grouped into specialist classes, they are not restricted but given the chance to be challenged to reach their full potential. This leads themselves to make even greater academic progress.
On the other hand, I believe that students of different academic levels should be mixed into the same class. First, when studying in the same atmosphere, not only teachers but brighter student can also help those who are less capable with their queries during the learning process. As a result, their wonders can be cleared and explained in detail, which helps improve their performance. Moreover, better students can be a positive role model for the others in terms of both academy and perseverance. This may provoke a sense of competitiveness and motivate them to try harder to catch up with their better peers. By giving these students a chance to be in the same atmosphere with the talented ones, no one will be left behind.
To conclude, it may be reasonable that streaming students based on their intelligence may helps these elite students to improve to their furthest extent. However, I still hold the opinion that giving a mixed-ability class will provide all students, especially the slower ones, with the chances to study better without anyone lagging behind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-12 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Khanhu010101 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Khanhu010101 | 61 | view |
- The graph below show relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- People have different job expectations for jobs Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently What are advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint 67
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small commun 73
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09152542373 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68061229483 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9308434385 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20638471659 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720334495846 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780864845002 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129830644836 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583807284226 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.