Large companies use sport events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In order to attract a sufficient number of customers, some big companies make deals with sport events to introduce their products to participants and audiences. There are opponents who believe that not only this approach is meaningless but also occurs numerous drawbacks. From where I stand, trying to advertise products in sport event seems not to be a inefficient method
There are lots of reasons could be highlighted to support the approach. By using sport events to find out the potential target customers, companies whose products relating to sport could draw attention to sport fans, therefore, their product might be well-known. Moreover, if the products used by athletes, the company's reputation will be raised and it also has people' trust on the quality.
In contrast, this promoting method might be responsible for many negatives on sports. People attend sport events mainly to watch a good match or to meet their stars, not to be interrupted by advertisement and promoting products. These unable the audience to enjoy the moment.
All in all, it is reasonable to promote products through sport events and this also gives a lot of advantages to the company's income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...products in sport event seems not to be a inefficient method There are lots of...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 192.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17708333333 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80390275504 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619791666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3839009735 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3642011623 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142181438921 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871852014954 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224562211305 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233405648101 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.