Large companies use sport events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree
There has been a colossal upsurge in prodigies discussing the topic of cash cow enterprises sponsors for sports competitions to promote their cargoes. While some proponents contend that this trend affects adversely the image of sports events, I disagree with this statement and opine that this trend might influence positively to these contests. In this essay, I will cite my appropriate points related to this issue to stand for my viewpoint.
Amid the advertisement age, the business could apply many methods to increase their sales in many paradigms and not except for sports contests. First and foremost, it costs large entrepreneurs an arm and a leg to advertise their products in sports competitions. The prodigious sum of money that comes from these advertisements could support the producer to set the award for the championship and have enough funds to find the best place for organizing the event. Secondly, this is the strategy the company widespread their images to the public and access potential customers who don’t know them before. The customers still own free choices to purchase or not whereas they are attracted by the products. Thirdly, because of their promotion, people can watch sports events and sometimes stumble on seeing their necessary products even their items are benefitted for their life. To illustrate, Pocari Sweat posted its image in a range of sports competitions such as the Olympic Game, World Cup, etc its advertisement not only doesn’t negatively affect the viewers but also give a testament for the customer to try. Moreover, the nutrient in this product can be beneficial for our health and its advertising is a way the attract more customers to the business.
On the other hand, it is admitted that the advertisements of these companies in sports events sometimes are not related to the topic of the game and make the audiences feel irritated. However, the poster or clip promoting their products might make the customers don’t get bored and dull during break time and still have the energy to follow the next round. Without the sponsorship from these marketing tactics, the price of tickets to join in these events will remarkably rise and it can deter the chances of sport lovers from observing these competitions. Furthermore, some sports events will be wiped out because of the lack of funds from the organization. Finally, it is so meaningless to state that these advertisements in sports events can create a repercussion to the spectaculars while people earn many merits from this social phenomenon.
In conclusion, it is all stated that large businesses making use of sports events to promote their products still bring some negligible number of setbacks to the viewers. I wholeheartedly opine that this marketing strategy could be astonishingly beneficial for companies, producers of sports events, and even the viewers based on the above mentions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1213, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...our health and its advertising is a way the attract more customers to the business. On th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, whereas, while, except for, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2440.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 471.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1804670913 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8502660842 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1514606616 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.555555556 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321480414338 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10531166799 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672932891448 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210492156838 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243412845709 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.