Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people give a thought that a huge amount of money is blown off by maintaining public libraries whose functions are completely substituted with advanced technology. I partly have an agreement with this idea since public libraries have their own advantages mentioned below.
On the one hand, advanced computer technology plays as an alternative for the substitution of some functions of public libraries to some extent. The first reason is that online sources house a whole variety of information. There are numerous kinds of people, from researchers to ordinary ones, contributing information to the internet daily, which enriches not only the depth but also the width of information. Noteworthy is the fact that when it comes to the internet, users can keep themselves up-to-date whenever AND wherever they are. They can use any kinds of DEVICES such as portable tablets, mobile phoneS, or private laptops to browse any websites, as long as their pieces of equipment are connected to the Internet. This is a huge advantage for users, especially the ones with a hectic schedule.
On the other hand, public libraries have their own irreplaceable benefits. First of all, this kind of information source is perfectly suitable for the low-tech, especially the elderly. Without having any knowledge of how to use a computer, the over-middle-age people or the technology illiterate ones tend to go to nearby libraries to browse for their information in need. When it comes to a trustable source of information, public libraries prove themselves. Since the whole variety of books stored in these places are published by many publishers having their own reputation, the information is all examined thoroughly before coming out to the readers. Meanwhile, information on the internet can be posted by anyone, therefore there is a requirement to clarify the valuable one before users use the information on purpose.
I totally agree that computer technology works a treat by providing everyone with a huge amount of information which can be reached no matter when and where. Despite that, public libraries are the better choice for anyone who knows barely about technology and is eager to search for the reliable source of information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | linh đan | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their own advantages mentioned below. On the one hand, advanced computer techn...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25139664804 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94218289472 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533519553073 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4365334941 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233575007346 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745426816452 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060119929348 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153190566655 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381948500588 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.