Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a real difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental improvement is a global concern. It is argued that only governments and big companies can contribute efficiently, and individuals can only do so much but with little effects on the improvement of the environment. However, this issue concerns everyone and I believe that individuals, governments, and business groups should work hand in hand for the betterment of the environment.
Undoubtedly, governments and companies play a big role in saving the planet. Through government regulations, laws can be implemented to mitigate activities that harm nature. For instance, in a local government, there’s a rule that burning garbages or incineration is against the law. This is due to the fact that the fumes from burning releases noxious gases into the air that is harmful to the earth’s ozone layer. Also, companies have big impacts in saving mother earth. One strategy implemented by a large fast-food chain was the use of reusable straws, or not using plastic straws. This minimizes the amount of plastic garbages that takes hundreds of years to decompose.
Similarly, individuals also could highly contribute in improving the current state of the environment. It may be little acts of recycling products, abiding in proper waste disposal, or simply taking a walk or riding a bike instead of driving. These activities may not be as profound compared to what large associations could implement but if all or most of the population do these the results will be as effective. Also, there are few individuals who are financially capable of giving billions of their money to fund research on how to preserve the environment.
All in all, the premise of who could contribute more to saving the environment should be disregarded since everyone should work hard in preserving nature. Every effort in saving mother earth is important because these acts will have a positive cumulative effect in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important because these acts will have a positive cumulative effect in the long r...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive cumulative effect in the long run.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23948220065 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01793426562 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57928802589 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8309135065 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195542705236 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057299924369 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879178304148 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112009707612 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889399302488 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.