Some people believe that if students take one year gap away from studies after completing school before starting university it would benefit them. Do you agree or disagree?
Taking a gap year after a high school is a common practice among students. This is for the fact that this is believed to benefit young individuals holistically. In my opinion, there are positive effects in taking a year off from academic education, however, the benefits greatly depend on how a person would use that year for his/her personal development.
Undoubtedly, rest from a school year offers advantages to students in many aspects. Firstly, this time could be an opportunity to travel to different places and explore the world. For instance, many young students like to go backpacking across Europe to discover architectural and historical sites that broaden their understanding of the continent and its history. Secondly, students who take a gap year could explore their interests and gain skills in a particular field before they finally commit to a degree and pursue a long term career. For example, an internship to a health facility as a nursing assistant could help a person decide if he/she would commit to pursuing a four-year degree in nursing and work in the medical field. This is beneficial as it enhances understanding of the field, one would commit to in the long-term.
However, there are times that when a student enters a gap year it leads to negative circumstances. This is due to the fact that the year is spent on other activities that do not benefit the student. As in the case of young individuals who tend to be in every single social event, such as parties in different bar clubs. Another is they could waste their time playing computer games or activities that could lead to addiction. Thus, it is clear that if a person does not spend his/her gap year in a fruitful way, it could have long term repercussions in his/her life.
To conclude, students have the liberty to choose if they could take a gap year or not. If the gap year is well-planned and aims to improve oneself, like exploring places and improving skills, then it could be beneficial for the long term. Meanwhile, if the time is spent only on leisure activities, it is least likely to improve one’s personal growth overall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | sophiemetropolis | 74 | view |
- Today single use products are still very common What are the problems associated with this What are some possible solutions 78
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Today single use products are still very common What are the problems associated with this What are some possible solutions 78
- People today generally have better lives than people in the past did To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people believe that if students take one year gap away from studies after completing school before starting university it would benefit them Do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fruitful way" with adverb for "fruitful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... person does not spend his/her gap year in a fruitful way, it could have long term repercussions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...r in a fruitful way, it could have long term repercussions in his/her life. To c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84383561644 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76868801548 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504109589041 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0316483794 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4705882353 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214828334716 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785351352412 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608159063445 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141054398548 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044537689864 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.