In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
There is a common circumstance that rural citizens are relocating to cities in a great number of countries, leading to a significant decline in the population living in the countryside. In these upcoming paragraphs, the argument will be discussed in depth from my prospect.
The dwindling of rural residents hits painful damage to local businesses. The demands will no longer be sufficient for suppliers to continue operating in the unprofitable market. That is to say, the daily goods and necessities will have not been provided then, exacerbating the facilitates for people sticking there. For example, Co-op grocery stores open for meeting the demands of nearby people. Without buyers, the closure is the evitable result, which means rural residents have to travel a long distance to access similar goods. Moreover, it is extremely inconvenient for those who are unable to have reasonable transportation.
Otherwise, the rapid growth of city dwellers will be an astonishing case in alleviating the quality of living standards, from education to medical service. Imagining the pictures of an exceeding number of students in one class or the number of patients overwhelms the doctor's controllable faculty, the quality of a lesson and the treatment will be reduced by then. In particular, the ordinary number of students must be lower than 40 in each class; however, due to the ground-breaking population, the schooling demand for children is drastically high while there are not sufficient educational institutions to fulfill it. The result is, children have to overlap with each other to learn and the teacher is not able to take care all of them.
To recapitulate, the consequences outweigh the merits, therefore, it should foster the rural zone with investments in local businesses and integration of utilities into the lifestyle. Besides, the government may consider enacting some policies along with punishment to improve and deter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-18 | tsln7607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | hau le | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | hau le | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | tran quynh | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
- The diagrams show the structure of a solar panel and its use 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in particular, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3868852459 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07136999161 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613114754098 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0445256781 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0526812310442 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185366476666 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270600071643 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0352078129563 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235420797996 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.