In many countries people are living in a "throwaway society" where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to?
Some persons suggest that raising the price of fuels is a significant solution of ecological problems. This essay agrees that expensive prices of fuels will not be a good resolution of environmental problems because rising prices will cause another two problems. The first problem is people will face new suffering from high prices and the second problem is popular protests, wherefore these 2 issues will be discussed as follows.
Many things depends on petroleum, gas and other power resources, therefore ؛increasing the cost of them will not solve any dilemma, furthermore ؛ that will bring new suffering to society. If the government increase the cost, works will be harder as a result of the inability of people to dispense with fuel. For example, in the recent time in Yemen, although the price of fuel is really expensive as a result of the war ؛ fuels still demanded sharply, that means buying fuels will not stop in any case.
In addation؛ once the nation experience struggles in daily life that will lead to popular anger against the government, because Individuals in every state try to push the political decision to popular favour. For instance ,in 1976 ؛ the president of Egypt Anwar Al-Sadat raised the prices of fuel for economic reform, but Egyptians launched a big protest to enforce the president to Undo the decision and this was finally achieved .
In conclusion, this article supports that the rise in the price of power resources has 2 negative effects, which they are pressure citizens' budgets and disrupt the security of political life. It is recommended that authorities should find out another procedure to solve this snag instead make things worse by rasing the prices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | yasir2002011 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | yasir2002011 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Toghrul Azizli | 73 | view |
- life was better when technology was simpler.to extent do you agree with that? 84
- In many countries people are living in a "throwaway society" where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 56
- the charts below show the precentage of water used for different perposes in six area of the world. 56
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 67
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples of your knowledge. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uffering from high prices and the second problem is popular protests, wherefore t...
^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'depend'.
Suggestion: depend
... be discussed as follows. Many things depends on petroleum, gas and other power resou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...decision to popular favour. For instance ,in 1976 ؛ the president of Egypt Anwar A...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the prices of fuel for economic reform, but Egyptians launched a big protest to ...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e decision and this was finally achieved . In conclusion, this article supports ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, really, second, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06737588652 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63033799554 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1334498833 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.9 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955415339957 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382487781623 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.019652041511 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566915317735 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00638274981886 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.