In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to?
Nowadays, the proliferation of single-use products has become a pressing concern for most countries. The main causes are economic and technological factors whereas this culture will lead to no other than environmental degradation in the long run.
Firstly, technological advancement in recent years has led to the culture of consumerism. For instance, plastic could not be produced on such a mass scale 100 years ago. However, today, plastic in various forms is no longer expensive but even profitable to use for companies like Walmart. In addition, every material from furniture to electronic gadgets is at a considerable price. Therefore, young people have grown the habit of replacing their properties and household items such as dishes, sofas, and bags in a short period, which the old generation used to be more protective of. The growth of advertisements also makes the situation possible by attracting customers to buy even if it is unnecessary.
A variety of environmental problems will still exist if human beings continue to follow the same practice. Take the production of plastic for example, in which raw materials are burned. Following this, it is transported by ship or plane, running on petrol, and finally to the supermarkets by carting on trucks. Therefore, it is evident that fuel consumption from factories and modes of transport is massive. As a result, this reckless manufacturing can lead to the endangerment of living things and trigger climate change and other natural disasters.
In conclusion, the so-called ‘throwaway society’ results from cost-effective productions coupled with increased affordability for the public. Since it is deteriorating the earth and exploiting natural resources, more governments should do educational campaigns, introduce recycling plans and limit imports from foreign countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-12 | Aung | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-26 | qtanhthu | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-30 | Kshee | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-16 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-03 | kaka singh | 76 | view |
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 92
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 79
- The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 78
- The charts below show information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te change and other natural disasters. In conclusion, the so-called ‘throwaway ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...limit imports from foreign countries.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66192170819 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23231990949 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67615658363 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.715293954 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154906060403 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411456557452 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372406754782 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847215571192 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234961658656 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.