In many countries today, if people want to find a job, they have to move away from their friends and their families. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
With the prosperity of modern society, more and more jobs are available in many places no matter how far it is. In fact, today, there are numerous young people who are willing to sacrifice their chance to stay near families and friends to relocate for work. While this may have certain drawbacks, from my perspective, the benefits are much more significant.
On the one hand, those who move away from their loved ones are prone to several problems in accordance with mental health disorders. This is because physical distances obviously discourage them from confiding with their families. To give an example, this is often the case for migrant workers, who keep their suffering to themselves just to ease their families’ worries. Therefore, they are fairly vulnerable and are more likely to get stuck with psychological issues, such as overthinking or depression. Even worse, both their families and friends do not aware in terms of introverted people, and tend to distance themselves from their new colleagues.
On the other hand, for those relocating for a better job, this way may create more opportunities for them in order to achieve career fulfillment. First and foremost, there are often better career prospects available outside their hometown to people of working ages. Metropolitan areas like Ho Chi Minh City or Hanoi are hubs of various industries, which promise more career choices and significant sufficient income. Accordingly, employees can obtain a well-paid job at their fingertips. The second reason lies in advancing their careers faster. Living with their parents could indeed trigger emotional issues because of family conflicts, having a negative impact on their work performances. Without that potential disturbance, employees can devote wholeheartedly to their work and thrive.
In conclusion, due to work conditions, the youth have a tendency to live away from homes, which has both pros and cons. Nonetheless, I still believe that this is more beneficial to individuals with the purpose of the climbing career ladder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-24 | lethianhthu | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | kevann | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | Charles Le | 64 | view |
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 78
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It is better to be unemployed in jobs rather than to be employed in jobs even if they don t feel happy or enjoy Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33230769231 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82669271694 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633846153846 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9957064381 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.941176471 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302544496959 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945432919052 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055630054338 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174312394503 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641396861392 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.