Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology. However, this change may only benefit workers, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Because of COVID-19, people have to work at home using the Internet. Some people, however, contend that this is only beneficial to the workers, not the managers. I disagree with this view, as supervisors don’t need to act like role models and save lots of time for them with online meetings.
Employers have to be archetypal for their employees. Due to their higher pay increments and better perks, they are expected to have a more substantial output. Thus, managers are obligated to work harder at the expense of their health. It seems logical to conclude that they do not have to work as hard when working at home, as workers cannot see and judge them. Furthermore, they needn’t strictly follow the dress code, which they have to if they request their staff to do the same, and may wear more comfortable clothes that don’t hinder their jobs. These range from people wearing pajamas while working to people pairing their vests with shorts.
Another argument is that employers can save their time by doing online meetings. With the Internet, people can now meet without being in the same location. As the time and resources spent on commuting to meet physically are huge. Using modern technology can save a considerable amount of money and energy, enabling them to work more efficiently. Examples can be seen in Japan, where directors used to spend their whole day on the train to attend one meeting, but now they can participate in several appointments.
In conclusion, the use of technology would lessen the burden on employers and save them time and money, leading them to do their jobs more productively.
- Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology However this change may only benefit workers not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices 67
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world especially among young people Identify the possible causes of this trend and propose some solutions you think would be effective 78
- Some say that music plays an important role in society whilst others think it is simply a form of entertainment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92700729927 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5418129441 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8344635029 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279592034898 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909572751143 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487175454841 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161262114759 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343821175004 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.