Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology. However, this change may only benefit workers, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Working remotely has become a common practice for many employees in the modern world due to technological advancements. However, some people believe that this change may only benefit worker but not employers. I agree with this view, as convenience and freedom for employees may not adequately compensate for the challenges employers face.
There are many reasons why working from home can benefit workers. One of the main benefits is that it can save time and money that they would otherwise spend on commuting, getting dressed and eating out. This is especially true for people who often spend more than an hour commuting to work. By working from home, they can avoid road rules, fuel, parking fees and utilize the extra time for other pursuits. Another benefit is that remote work gives employees more activity and autonomy in managing their own schedules and work environments. This can help create conditions for a healthy work-life balance, thereby reducing stress while increasing job satisfaction.
On the other hand, allowing employees to work remotely can negatively affect employers in many ways. One of the main drawbacks is that they may have to lose control and supervision of their employees because they cannot monitor their employees' work progress and performance as easily as in the office. For example, supervisors and managers may be unable to detect or correct any potential employee-related problems, which could affect the company's performance. Another challenge for employers is that they may experience difficulty communicating and collaborating due to the lack of face-to-face interaction with employees. Indeed, employers with a complex or creative project may have to coordinate with their remote employees via email, call or chat. This process can be slow and complicated, thus hindering innovation and productivity.
In short, working from home may be beneficial for worker, but not necessarily beneficial for employers. While workers may prefer convenience, flexibility, and balance, employers are likely to experience fewer control and communication problems without appropriate precautions.
- A person s personality is genetic if everyone in their family is kind they will also be kind There is nothing we can do to meaningfully change our personalities or modify our dispositions What do you think 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology However this change may only benefit workers not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57230769231 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99387935787 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587692307692 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1101411622 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.529411765 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32115471352 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11227929502 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057207645994 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203892914737 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478311061826 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.