Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

Food is being widely exported worldwide to meet the global demand. While this trend might be an economic driver for many developing countries, personally, I assume that this is not a sustainable approach, in terms of its environmental impacts and economics. For that, in my perspective, the downsides of eating foreign foods outweigh the benefits.

On the one hand, imported foods are becoming more ubiquitous all over the world. The proliferation of global population and the expansion of different service sectors are triggering a food crisis in many places, especially in developed countries. Meanwhile, developing countries where agriculture accounts for a large part of the economy will significantly benefit from the exportation of food to other markets as this will create more jobs, which, in turn, drives the domestic economy forward. For instance, food exports snatch up to over 15% of Vietnam’s GDP, boosting its economy strongly since renovation in 1986. Furthermore, not only does this trend help countries to thrive, it also helps developed countries to alleviate food shortage and place their priority on other fields.

On the other hand, I believe that such a practice has more drawbacks than its benefits. Firstly, food that is transported over a long distance needs more preservatives to keep it fresh for a longer period of time. The consumption of this kind of food is detrimental to health the accumulation of such chemicals in human body , in the long term, will degrade the population’s wellbeing. A survey conducted by WHO concludes that those who eat seasonal food that is manufactured by local farmers are less prone to cancer, reproductive dysfunction, etc. Moreover, food miles are producing a large amount of carbon footprint, which also attributes to climate change. As global warming worsens ,economic performance will slow down, countries will have to spend a substantial amount of money to ease environmental problems, and the nation’s general wellbeing will drop dramatically.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-30 vuphuonglinh1996 84 view
2019-09-29 vuphuonglinh1996 89 view
2019-07-23 Esther Katlyn 78 view
2019-07-23 Esther Katlyn 56 view
Essays by user vuphuonglinh1996 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng its economy strongly since renovation in 1986. Furthermore, not only does this...
^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ervatives to keep it fresh for a longer period of time. The consumption of this kind of food i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mulation of such chemicals in human body , in the long term, will degrade the popu...
^^
Line 7, column 694, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...limate change. As global warming worsens ,economic performance will slow down, cou...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43604651163 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15113392806 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601744186047 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2256676536 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373305024935 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143030083979 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17192360947 0.0667982634062 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346228036011 0.151304729494 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.377665858098 0.056905535591 664% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.