Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings. Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development, because this land would be better used for housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that there are many residents leading to a situation where a lack of houses is demanded in our contemporary society. While leaders consider that forest parks will instead as a key to displacing the housing shortage. I completely disagree with this point, as below are some reasons to support my view.
On the one hand, the option to not pull down the parkland to replace habitation is for the following reasons. The first reason for this is a place to build green space for the municipality, which is to reduce emissions namely vehicle emissions, devices, and humans, creating a healthy living environment for the community. Secondly, it not only is for shade and freezes the air but it is also a place people come to play and enjoy the moment after hard working around the clock in the day and cutting down stress for recreation. A park is a place for children and adults to have fun, lighten and enjoy nature. If we tear down the parkland, the community will lack an important source of green space for society as well as entertainment.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why I also believe that the leader shouldn't be reassigning parks which is not a good solution to resolve the housing crisis. It means that the government should expand and carry out the land area. Firstly, building the new urban development in the outskirts. This is a plan that I think is quite suitable for the problem. Consequently, we can both buy new houses and keep the space in the parkland. Secondly, building many flats or skyscrapers is the method so that having many houses for the inhabitant which help to decrease the housing shortage rate without having to increase the land use region.
In conclusion, many issues in mentioning by the government are not sustainable or equitable solutions to the housing crisis. In addition to that, we have a lot of better ways as well as the balance between the development of a healthy environment for all residents rather than demolishing parks.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development because this land would be better used for h 73
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative development 55
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s demanded in our contemporary society. While leaders consider that forest parks will...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... I completely disagree with this point, as below are some reasons to support my ...
^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...sons why I also believe that the leader shouldnt be reassigning parks which is not a goo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76217765043 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68993252347 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54441260745 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3791056754 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336317469266 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961173206272 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447543965575 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177229235657 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896261605054 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s demanded in our contemporary society. While leaders consider that forest parks will...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... I completely disagree with this point, as below are some reasons to support my ...
^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...sons why I also believe that the leader shouldnt be reassigning parks which is not a goo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76217765043 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68993252347 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54441260745 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3791056754 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336317469266 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961173206272 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447543965575 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177229235657 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896261605054 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.