Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings. Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development, because this land would be better used for housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some local authorities concern on one of the urgent factors - house shortage in urban areas - which should be solved by converting park area to residence. I, personally, state the same perspective of this issue for the reasonable points, which will be deliberated below.
On the one side, relocating park land to be housing estate would lose the pollutant absorption in metropolitan cities. If local officials start the project, all living organism will undergo poor functional diversity. Not only does this deteriorate human respiratory system but also threaten ecosystem, particularly pollinator species (bees and butterflies). Furthermore, to provide public space become the best place of relaxing and enjoying leisure after work pressure. For instance, New York’s Central Park, a world-famous public park, offers urban dwellers recreational activities in order to spend time in nature to relieve stress and anxiety.
On the flip side, with green house concept, one of residential developments aims to take part in sustainable city in the world. ACROS Fukuoka in Japan - one of such places - leads public awareness to lower carbon footprint by way of generating radiative cooling breeze which sustain a healthier environment for city residents. In addition, construction of new buildings can avoid the increasing number of informal settlements induced by overwhelming urbanisation. To illustrate, mole people living along trail sewage in Las Vegas encumber local authorities with the serious cost of environment.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, government project to establish residence by relocating a park is more beneficial for tackling housing shortage. Those include implementing green building concept as well as reducing squatter camps in central city. This is as long as the proportion of oxygen producers could control emission spectrum.
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generation for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree wi 89
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars globally Others feel that it serves to prevent less ethical politicians from running a country and starting wars Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69892473118 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07813809563 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702508960573 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3930879629 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266569023788 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712495935102 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514620312253 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141602884475 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303717074094 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.