Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
In many societies these days, the awareness of food nutrition has raised dramatically over the last decade. It is inevitable that food is a basic element of the health of public but some may contain an excessive amount of sugar, associating with diseases. Some advocate the idea of charging those items more in an effort to discourage one to buy them. Personally, I strongly challenge this idea and I will outline the evidence for supporting it.
To a certain extent, exercise is a key factor to maintain public health rather than what nutri-ents people intake. No doubt, exercises usually plays an important role in our health so it is essential to ensure one doing an adequate amount of exercises every day. Research by the University of Oxford state that patients who suffer from obesity are often lack of exercising. Therefore, it is crucial that one does exercises on a daily basis with the intention of burning calories from food and preventing other health issues.
While doing regular exercises is vital, restricting the proportion of sugar in artefacts is neces-sary as well. Moreover, it is a feasible measure that governments could carry out. To achieve this target, food production companies could only use those substances in a small proportion for food. In China, junk food such as hamburgers must have less than 5 percent of fat and stay below a certain calorie level. Otherwise, manufacturers would be fined thousands. By this, I mean that introducing legislation to control the number of calories is a possible way to main-tain the public health. As a result, it is a brilliant idea to have governments and food producers to cooperate with each other for tackling public health challenges.
Despite the fact that other approaches are noticeably effective, setting the prices of junk food to be high is a practical method as they are highly accessible for anyone in most cases. Need-less to say, they have been increasingly popular in different classes of our societies, from those who suffered from poverty to wealthy millionaires. Nonetheless, the disadvantaged groups are the major customers of fast food, whereas the wealthy cans afford healthy food that is extremely costly in most circumstances. Provided that the expenditure on high calories food could escalate noticeably, the vast majority of fast food customers will drop significantly in the foreseeable future. Although some may still be able to purchase those food, there would be less consumption of those food and the public is more likely to stay healthy.
To conclude, I completely disagree with the idea of forcing one to pay more for fatty food. Even though it is one of the most common methods to deal with public health, there are more measures need to be taken place such as doing physical exercises and monitoring food pro-duction.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 548, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'calories'' or 'calorie's', 'calory's'?
Suggestion: calories'; calorie's; calory's
.... Provided that the expenditure on high calories food could escalate noticeably, the vas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 725, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'those foods'?
Suggestion: this food; those foods
...ough some may still be able to purchase those food, there would be less consumption of tho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 772, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'those foods'?
Suggestion: this food; those foods
...ood, there would be less consumption of those food and the public is more likely to stay h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, i mean, no doubt, such as, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2361.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06652360515 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84282609194 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547210300429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5495521935 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.318181818 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203615678171 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551510420005 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347288810279 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1086744826 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027756216911 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.