Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar,
which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more
expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is an undeniable fact that processed foods contain an excessive amount of sugar leading to serious health issues which is why many people advocate for an increase in the cost of such products to decrease their consumption by people. Notwithstanding the tantalizing side of such products, I strongly hold sides with those agreeing with a considerable cost increase to achieve a healthy lifestyle.
First and foremost, one of the most detrimental ingredients in any product is mostly considered sugar due to its adverse side effects. Consuming sugar more than allowed intervals can lead to significant maladies including diabetes which results in being dependent on medicine for the rest of your life. Considering a large proportion of one individual’s calorie intake consists of sugar, to discourage this addiction of people inflationary pressure must be exerted on such types of foods.
In addition to that, the main customers of sweet products are mostly children who are susceptible to more external diseases at their younger ages. Experts suggest that high-sugar diets for not only adults but also children must be limited, otherwise they can face more serious chronic issues in the future such as obesity. Consuming fructose increases your hunger and desire for food more than glucose, the main type of sugar found in starchy foods. Obesity rates are rising worldwide, and evidence suggests that added sugar, often from sugar-sweetened beverages, is a major contributor to obesity. Moreover, eating too much sugar can cause cavities in teeth due to bacteria in your mouth feeding on sugar and releasing acid byproducts, which cause tooth demineralization.
To recapitulate, the junk foods we find really alluring on the shelves of the stores are turned out to be containing an excessive amount of sugar accelerating many serious problems such as chronic diseases which is why I reckon how it is important to use taxation strategy on such types of products to prevent overconsumption of such products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 67
- News plays an important part of most people s lives Why is news so important to people Why is so much news dedicated to bad news Should the news focus on good news instead 72
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some countries have introduced laws to limit the working hours that an employer can ask from an employee Why are these laws introduced Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...shelves of the stores are turned out to be containing an excessive amount of sugar accelerati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, so, i reckon, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.296875 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97770196366 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603125 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3085267994 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.090909091 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0909090909 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294156251265 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105374063229 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453695466372 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172152398722 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205662226201 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.