Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Exceptionally, there are some museums ticketing visitors while some do not. I contend that the disadvantages of this are eclipsed by its advantages as the tourists’ experience would be better and conservation awareness will be enhanced among people.
For one thing, the option to set an entrance cost for museums would hamper low-class residents from ample exotic knowledge and broaden their horizon in many aspects. One possibility is that some individuals could not afford the fee as their financial capacity is limited. Recreational activities are deemed lavish to them and paying for a museum ticket is deemed the same thing. This is negatively influential in terms of their understanding about the cultures are considerably limited but also their sense of appreciation of history is comparatively lower than the general residents. Ostensibly, instead of educational purposes, museums function based on commercial benefits, which is especially miserable for those living in poor conditions and even unable to receive formal education.
For another, I believe that the prescribed downside is just a minor exception, with regards to the general public, a museum ticket is generally affordable. These institutions should have a reasonable entrance fee in order to maintain their operation, and for the most part, instill in the public the duty of preserving historical and cultural value in these places. Precisely, when tourists visit the museums, they will contribute financially to the state budget or the owners to upgrade the facilities and offer greater experience for the visitors. Importantly, paying for the ticket would entail an appreciative sensation among people. Those who come from poor backgrounds or with low socioeconomic status are occasionally exposed to such things, which would make them treasure the moments and uphold their responsibilities in preserving invaluable objects as well as other forms of artifacts for their priceless meanings.
To conclude, there are minor drawbacks of ticketing museum visitors. However, I contend that it is overshadowed by its benefits within a firm.
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup etc Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do you 84
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can we do to encourage this 89
- During the 20th century contact between different parts of the world developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunication To what extent do you agree that societies benefit from the increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners brough 78
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do you agre 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...city is limited. Recreational activities are deemed lavish to them and paying for...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is is negatively influential in terms of their understanding about the cultures a...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... a minor exception, with regards to the general public, a museum ticket is generally affordabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56965944272 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08523213461 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613003095975 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1895431804 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198116703039 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667500640596 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480226837021 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11208442541 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341089641194 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.