Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, most of museums are charging fees for entrance, meanwhile other museums are free of charge. While there are both advantages and disadvantages associated with this topic, the positive aspect take precedence over the drawback. This essay will demonstrate the two benefits of applying entrance fees to museums also the negative effect of it.
The first commonly benefit of charging for admission is controlling the amount of people, therefore museums will be more organized and observed as well, however if there is many people, guards will be out of control of the people, for instance, many of antiques have been stolen from a famous museum in 19th century. Secondly, entrance fees are significant, because it will help for renovation of the museum, in addition to covering the expenses, and create an intrinsic value to that museum, for instance, some people preferred to visit the museums that have ticket fees, so they are saving it as an antique for memorize.
On the other hand, there are also drawback for these fees, which can create a massive gap with the tourists. Most of tourists prefer to visit a cheap country rather than an expensive one, and therefore it will effect negatively on the tourism of the country, although it will not be a critical problem. For instance, when Italy applied a high fees for some museums instead of being free, the records of visitors was reduced to be lower than the average. Additionally, schools will decrease the students education trip and it will effect negatively on students to learn in practical environment.
In conclusion, although there are drawbacks to having admission fees for museums. It is clear that free entrance can make a significant contribution to the tourism of their nation by attracting a large number of tourists, therefore it will be beneficial to the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the museums') or simply say ''most museums''.
Suggestion: most of the museums; most museums
Nowadays, most of museums are charging fees for entrance, meanwhi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the tourists') or simply say ''Most tourists''.
Suggestion: Most of the tourists; Most tourists
...create a massive gap with the tourists. Most of tourists prefer to visit a cheap country rather ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...an expensive one, and therefore it will effect negatively on the tourism of the countr...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 495, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...Additionally, schools will decrease the students education trip and it will effect negat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 531, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...the students education trip and it will effect negatively on students to learn in prac...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e tourism of their nation by attracting a large number of tourists, therefore it will be benefici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71959512209 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4995484634 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326498012611 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125190278372 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107301154046 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197813527877 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911598129052 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.