Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued by some that with the aim of upgrading the quality of education, high school students are recommended to give a review about their educators, while other individuals mention that those judges could trigger disrespect and do not obey the rule in the school. This essay will elaborate both sides of the argument, and I believe that commenting on teachers will allow teachers with a chance to improve professional skills.
Some consider that instructors should gain feedback from people who attend school for the purpose of enhancing teaching skills and professional knowledge. In other words, they could adjust inappropriate teaching methods and upgrade specialized knowledge thanks to student’s comments. For instance, educators give too many exercises that students do not have the ability to make, they could comment to their teacher to reduce the number of exercises. Consequently, this would create the best learning environment for students.
Despite this, others feel that allowing students to rate their teachers could detrimentally affect the classroom learning environment. To put it another way, some students are generally immature and inexperienced, so they tend to give reviews that exceed the regulations and limits, even severely criticizing their educators. For example, when a student who violates the rule in the classroom will be punished by their teacher, and as a result they lose their temper and misjudge the teachers on Facebook and Internet forums.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmenting on teachers will allow teachers with a chance to improve professional sk...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... teachers could detrimentally affect the classroom learning environment. To put i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85789705381 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627705627706 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.495324316 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.555555556 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295027866897 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110339214996 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604998345878 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194950652507 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419803433182 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.