Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
With the thriving of living standards, people are raising more concerns in every aspect of their life, particularly enhancing the educational system in order to transmit knowledge to students effectively. However, this leads to arising of different views, which make controversy sprouting across the country. While there are some valid arguments that institutional schools should create more chances for learners to give feedback to their teachers, others believe that this way is not proper and polite in a classroom environment. This essay will shed light on both sides before making a final note.
One major ground behind the rising of protesting students making commentss to their teachers springing from traditional rules. Obviously, in the past, learners had to obey the school’s regulations as well as absolutely respect their teachers if they do not want to be considered disobedient children. Furthermore, they are likely to be evaluated badly in terms of moral standards. Another reason lies in the fact that even the majority of high school students may not be mature enough to make objective judgments. Their feedback might end up being personal criticism, which contributes to lonesome in order to the improvement of the educational quality.
Nonetheless, voicing the opinion on teaching methods will make a valuable contribution to altering suitable study plans for both learners and teachers. The first advantage is two-way communication allows participants to actively give positive thought about the method that mentors transit knowledge as well as tailor teaching styles. Accordingly, thanks to students feedback, mentors may recognize neither plus nor minus so as to tailor teaching styles. Therefore, their lessons might become more interesting and vivid, which results in better outcomes for both parties.
In conclusion, students may not be the best people to comment on their teachers. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that both educators and government should join hands to encourage students to raise their voices about teachers’ approaching methods because of the tremendous merits of building a sustainable educational system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- The table shows the income and expenditure of Brooklyn Hall the building used to hire in over the period of three years 84
- Topic The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 78
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 73
- Topic More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 89
- Topic It s true that people don t have time to cook anymore 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rs may recognize neither plus nor minus so as to tailor teaching styles. Therefore, thei...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63302752294 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92468597076 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617737003058 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6173958618 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278046056807 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839153860793 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047093701332 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159998149847 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544454679824 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.