Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people advocate students to showcase their thinking, albeit it could lead students to look down on and criticize their teachers. The affects of the two views will be elaborated below.
By allowing students to think independently, their natural development will be tremendously benefited. First, encouragement of unappropriate arguments against educational employees would stimulate critical thinking of students. The skills which is highly valued by employers these days, would imply a higher chance of being employment for students in their later life. An additional point in support of debates in classroom is that it motivates the democracy among class members, which means that any students have right to protect their ideas. Finally, from teachers' perspective, by disccussing with pupils, they are able to comprehend their students' thoughts and opinions. This would be a useful source of reference which helps teachers raise their educational quality and skills.
On the other hand, misunderstanding between students and teachers may have negative impacts on both. Youngsters who are immature mentally may overexploit arguments and debates against their teachers. This may come under forms of personal criticism or taboo subjects outside of discussed topics. In addition, uncontrolled discussion would cause chaos and lead either teachers or students to feel inconfident and angry. These two factors are important for educators and learners to maintain their attention in the middle of lessons, which would lower teaching redeeming features. More importantly, if the phenomenon persists for a long period of time, students may have a tendency to disrepect their teachers which would finally result in the degradation of social values. This acts as a catalyst for social evils and crimes among the adolescents.
In sum, allowing young individuals to showcase their views would benefit their mental development. However, the movement could cause hard feelings on educational wokers and learners, which may reduce the quality of educating process. I believe that the limited used of the strategy would be more beneficial for young students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many different countries have most shops and products that are the same Some people consider this to be a positive development while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Art classes should be compulsory in high school Do you agree or disagree 78
- Intelligence is the most important quality of leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho are immature mentally may overexploit arguments and debates against their teac...
^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
..., if the phenomenon persists for a long period of time, students may have a tendency to disrep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, may, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62461538462 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87910242423 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587692307692 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5733948165 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262061380775 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834876607194 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504674142831 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168902425752 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534913958125 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.