Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Finding ways to enhance educational quality is usually regarded as a top priority in all educational systems. While high-school pupils are expected to express their own opinions about their teachers in some countries, I believe that this can also lead to a lack of respect and discipline in classes.
On the one hand, there is no denying that learners’ responses can make a contribution to strengthening the academic quality. It is true that the extent of students’ understanding is determined not only by the lesson content but also by the manner in which the teacher proceeds. For example, if the class progress is slow, teaching quickly will be ineffective, making almost all students barely absorb information. Without the students' comments, it will be challenging to judge whether the pace of the lesson is appropriate for the class, causing a decrease in the lesson's quality.
However, there are several disadvantages to allowing students to comment on and criticize their teachers. Firstly, teachers can be vulnerable to harsh comments from their students. Many people will believe that their efforts to provide valuable lessons deserve to be praised rather than criticized. It should be noted that this idea tends to be shared by teachers in Asian educational systems. Secondly, the class can be chaotic due to various comments. Thus, different ideas between students and their peers to find a teaching method that makes all students content are not practical.
In conclusion, for me, it seems that encouraging high-school students to comment on their teachers does not mean improving the quality of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence for films of television and cinema Others feel that violent films should not be released Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 67
- Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence for films of television and cinema Others feel that violent films should not be released Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Task 1 The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'judging'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: judging
...udents comments, it will be challenging to judge whether the pace of the lesson is appro...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91791263731 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583011583012 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9693018376 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280217377291 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958257909887 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683321418132 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185047598465 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06420905308 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.