Many people believe that counties should produce food for all population eats and import food as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that instead of importing, in all countries, food need to be produced as much as possible to served their own population. Form my point of view, this attitude is very reasonable but I'm not completely support this idea.

In some extent, I can generally understand that producing food for domestic demand is the first priority in some countries. The main reason is the food types and the quality of it effect directly on citizens' health and furthermore it plays an essential role in the development of the country. Therefor, producing and consuming domestic food is a good idea for ensuring people in that country will have a healthy life. Secondly, importing food form others countries may wast a lot of money from government' budget. Rather than conducting it people should be encouraged to manufacturing as much food as possible to benefit themselves and these money can be used for other more significant purposes.

However, I still believe that importing food from others is the developed trend that countries should apply. The first reason explain why I support this argument is nowadays, we are living in the industrialization and modernization so there are a lots of other careers the government should pay attention to improve instead of spending too much concentration for promoting agriculture and producing food, which just gain a little profit for country's development. The second reason supports this issue is importing food can save a lot of previous time which can used for other developing some others fields, which can earn more profits quicker. The last notion which is no less important is countries in the world do not have the similar weather conditions, thus it means in some nations agriculture can not develop and they do not have an ability to provide enough food for their population's demand. In this situation, importing food is very necessary.

In conclusion, I do not deny that food should be manufactured to served domestic need but if the countries want to gain more benefits for people or they can not develop the food making industry, the food importing will be very essential.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...w, this attitude is very reasonable but Im not completely support this idea. In...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...nd the quality of it effect directly on citizens health and furthermore it plays an esse...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food is a good idea for ensuring people in that country will have a healthy life...
^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
...nment budget. Rather than conducting it people should be encouraged to manufacturing a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...d as possible to benefit themselves and these money can be used for other more significant ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...lization and modernization so there are a lots of other careers the government should ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 645, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s, which can earn more profits quicker. The last notion which is no less important ...
^^^
Line 5, column 780, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ather conditions, thus it means in some nations agriculture can not develop and they do...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03389830508 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83142175462 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9187104859 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304529201363 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126945104303 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570979985996 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200391791635 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554876830117 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.