Many people believe that countries should produce food for all population eats and Import food as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As food production has become much-discussed issue, it is often said that government is supposed to spur local food productions to meet society’s eating needs and limit imported foods. I personally agree with the given statement, and explained more in this essay will the reasons be.
Perhaps, the primary reason is that to produce foods through local food companies could bring huge profit, particularly in a state having several agricultural industries, such as Indonesia, which could enhance the local agricultural productivity. As a result, it could lead prosperity to some local farmers, and could subsequently grow the national economic. Additionally, it is important for government to lessen imported foods, since it is undeniable fact that such foods are more affordable compared to the local foods. Thus, it would reduce the interest and sales of the local products. Of course, this condition will be an irony for the national economic circumstances. In addition, regarding the detrimental effect of importing foods, in particular imported fruits. Such fruits would likely harm the inhabitants' body, owing to the artificial preservatives involved. Because, this substance is used by importers in order to keep fruits fresh, as transporting food requires a long time to the targeted country.
It is widely accepted that importing foods could help a state in which people are facing certain foods shortage, which is impossible for them to produce their own foods. However, such drawback could be overcome by yielding the main crops suitable for the condition of that country.
Overall, it seems to me that to encourage local food productions and to limit imported foods deserve implementing due to the advantages that a country may gain, ranging from creating prosperity for local producers, increasing national economic growth, becoming a domestic market more competitive, to avoiding some harmful imported foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-18 | huathihongvan | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Muhammad Hossen Ali | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | dantesw | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | harith95 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 42 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 84
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram shows proposed changes to Foster Road 58
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 78
- Below is the map of Canterbury town. There is a plan of building a new school in this town where two possible sites (S1) and (S2) have been proposed. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...tate in which people are facing certain foods shortage, which is impossible for them ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able for the condition of that country. Overall, it seems to me that to encourag...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to implement'.
Suggestion: to implement
...ons and to limit imported foods deserve implementing due to the advantages that a country ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, in addition, in particular, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5033557047 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98650931225 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.760936265 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218174133713 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748759417226 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634433759126 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148298316141 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145852564376 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.