Many people believe that there is a general increase in antisocial behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situation How to improve it

Essay topics:

Many people believe that there is a general increase in antisocial behaviour and lack of respect for others.
What might have caused this situation? How to improve it?

Mutual understanding and respect are the two fundamentals for living in a society. However, some public assumed that overall, there has been an increase in cases for antisocial behaviour and lack of respect among each other. This essay will discuss the causes of the above problems and its solutions for improving these cases.

There are many reasons for the increase in cases of antisocial behaviour and life of respect in society. Firstly, increasing cases of antisocial behaviour and lack of respect is due to the income disparity among people. There have been huge income differences in the society so that higher income groups treat their lower owners as second class people limiting their resources and discriminating against them. For instance, in our society, there is a separate grocery store for the higher income people who has much more services compared to the general public grocery store visit by the lower-income people. Secondly, children are being upbringing without our cultures and values. Today, children are influenced by western cultures so, children are losing our traditional values to respect elders and live in the harmony.

On the other hand, the above causes can be improved to reduce the causes of antisocial behaviour and lack of respect. Governments should reduce the gap of income disparity among the public. If there is a lesser income disparity between higher-income earners and lower earners then they can live in harmony as there will be equal opportunity to access any resources between them. For example, In a mega society, there is a common grocery store for different income people to purchase grocery items. Our children should be brought up with our reach culture and values. This allow children how to treat people and respect for our elders.

To conclude, the major reasons for the increase in antisocial behaviour and lack of respect are due to the huge income disparity among public and children are not being upbringing with our cultures and values. The solution for the above causes are by reducing the gap of income among people and bringing up children with our traditional cultures and values.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-25 edmitric 89 view
2022-12-12 vishal sachdeva 73 view
2021-11-04 anchi 61 view
2021-11-04 anchi 61 view
2021-06-10 mangpahang 73 view
Essays by user mangpahang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... has much more services compared to the general public grocery store visit by the lower-income...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 263, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_NNS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lower earners than'?
Suggestion: lower earners than
...arity between higher-income earners and lower earners then they can live in harmony as there will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among public and children are not being upbringing with our cultures and values....
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19142857143 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57887968082 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431428571429 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6663783151 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.882352941 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299268269824 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120155854664 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103171288786 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216398414389 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471052295385 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.