Many people go to university for higher education. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians or plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, there is a remarkable emphasis on the pursuit of formal qualifications and academic occupations. Therefore, the predictable shortage of the manual workforce is becoming a serious problem. Considering both economic and social development aspects, I believe that a higher proportion of citizens should be oriented to pursue skill acquisition.
On the one hand, tertiary education can be inappropriate for the majority of high school students who have below-average academic performances. First and foremost, it is a fact that universities mainly aim to produce elite human resources for certain areas, namely science, technology, or law, and they are too difficult for most people. Students are aware of this situation during their general education stage. Nevertheless, their decisions after graduation lean towards university due to the Confucianism prejudice which disrespects and underestimates manual jobs. As a result, university degrees for many youngsters seem to soothe the hunger for fame and recognition, rather than suit their intellectual ability.
On the other hand, stimulating more young students to choose blue-collar jobs makes their lives and society function more effectively. Skill acquisition plays an essential role in ensuring basic living standards as well as supporting people to focus on their specialized jobs. The reason why there is a tendency to avoid manual occupations is biased career orientation for students at school. If teenagers have a more thorough understanding of skill-based jobs and know that they are a more suitable career than academic learning, they will possibly choose to become workers. In consequence, there will be significant growth in skilled labor, balancing with intellectual counterparts and bringing numerous benefits to the economy.
To sum up, vocational training is evidently irreplaceable in the well-being of human life. Recognizing its importance does not mean underestimating tertiary education, but delivering more thoughtful career orientation to the young generation. The harmonization between these two educational systems is the key to our society’s well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | vevinawynn | 61 | view |
- Many people go to university for higher education More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians or plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people go to university for higher education More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians or plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82649842271 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2951455895 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659305993691 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6379284729 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145921933516 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412971698584 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272874487916 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776840248279 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226227192431 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.