Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms. Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
Social media plays an important role in our life, it allows us to make friends online through apps or chat rooms. This is a popular way to expand our relationship, but others think that we have to meet face to face to build a friendship. I strongly disagree with this statement due to some reasons.
First, making friends online helps us connect with people around the world so that we can broaden our horizons. How amazing if we can talk, and text to foreign friends, we don’t need to meet directly but still can make good friends. For example, I am using Hellotalk, an app for learning English by talking to foreigners. All the friends I’ve met there are really friendly, they teach me English and tell me stories about their country, and culture. I really appreciate that, and I feel that I am living in the second world.
Second, when you feel lonely or bored, but don’t have anyone to talk with, you can go online and find a friend for a chitchat. I believe that there is always someone, who is willing to talk to you. In addition, if you are shy to talk to strangers, you should search for an online friend because he or she doesn’t know who you are and you do as well, so they won’t judge or complain about you. You can easily share your joy or sadness with them to release stress, they would cheer you up. Furthermore, you even can get well with them.
To sum up, meeting face to face is not always a possible idea to make friends. Making friends through social media is a better choice due to its benefits that you will have more friends from different countries so you can learn a lot from them, and you always have someone there to share your stories, your feelings comfortably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-24 | Nguyên-MTTN | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-24 | Nguyên-MTTN | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | P123456 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | Jagdeep kaur | 95 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | marylinhh | 87 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people say that money should be the main measure of success and personal status and wealthy people should be in high demand To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and relevant examples 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'face to'.
Suggestion: face to
..., but others think that we have to meet face to face to build a friendship. I strongly disagree...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, so, still, well, for example, i feel, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47756410256 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3169131132 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2443384407 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326253480077 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108277135598 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651313667049 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20930716251 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774977210648 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 50.2224549098 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.