Many people say the gap between rich and poor people
is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow
poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what
measures can be done to address those problem?
In recent decades, there has been a major concern about the increasing discrepancy between the rich and the poor in society. In this essay, several impacts of this trend will be put forward before a suggestion of some feasible solutions is given.
The gap between wealthy and destitute people exerts a wide range of undesirable outcomes. One of those problems is the imbalance in getting access to public services, such as education and health care. In fact, people in underprivileged regions often suffer from the higher rate of illiteracy and infectious diseases, as a result of lacking schools and hospitals, compared to the decent standard of living in prosperous areas. It is also true that crime is attributable to poverty, especially in deprived regions. To illustrate, the intense competition for food and shelter in Indian slums leads to a myriad of pickpocketing, violence and gun abuse criminals there.
However, this circumstance can be effectively resolved by both governmental and individual efforts. First, the introduction of tax policy is believed to not only curtail the income inequity but also facilitate needed infrastructure in remote areas. The state budget, which is mainly funded by the tax system, can invest in building schools and hospitals with cutting-edge facilities or give subsidies to support people in need. More importantly, the issue of birth control should be prioritized due to the uncontrolled birth rate in underdeveloped places. For example, many households in Vietnam have escaped poverty thanks to the availability of free contraception and maternity clinics across the country.
In conclusion, the disparity between rich and poor people has resulted in a plethora of problems but can be eradicated if many workable measures are implemented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the type of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 89
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39642857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09902675638 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653571428571 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.085859121 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.230769231 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273321495735 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794956610713 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981336969517 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178185555865 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117017685789 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.