The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line chart provides information on how many holidaymakers who paid a visit to one island of Caribe during the course of seven years starting from 2010.
It is obvious that an upward trend can be seen in the number of travelers staying on ships as well as island and the whole figure. In addition, the total statistic of visitors witnessed the most considerable change over the period.
In 2010, there were 1 million visitors to the island while no one chose to stay on cruise ships at that time. Since then, more and more tourists travelled to Caribe that the total figure increased exponentially and peaked at 3.5 million after seven years. Similarly, despite a stagnant time from 2011 to 2013, the figure for cruise ship passengers also experienced a sharp rise of 2 million.
Regarding the other statistic, standing at 0.75 million, staying on island was much preferable. However, the former remained stable for the first year, before slightly going up between 2011 and 2015 and ended at 1.5 million at the end of the period, falling in the prevalence.
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the type of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problem 84
- 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...ho paid a visit to one island of Caribe during the course of seven years starting from 2010. It is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the period, falling in the prevalence.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, similarly, so, then, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85164835165 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56591053475 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664835164835 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2279153627 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115343747221 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478928302586 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375844868553 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689746298485 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237199720394 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.