Many people think that companies or private institutions should take the responsibility of cleaning the waste in the environment, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Given the high volume of garbage produced by the private industries, many people argue that these industries should take the responsibility of cleaning the waste. However, I believe that the full control should be in the hand of the government, with some assistance from the private institutions.
Companies, especially manufacturing industries, produce tons of waste every day around the world. Comparing to the household waste, this waste is massive and pollutes the environment significantly, especially in the third-world countries where environmental awareness is very low. So, many people want the private industries to take the responsibility of cleaning the waste as they are responsible for most of the pollution.
However, there will be some problem if the responsibility is completely shifted to the companies. Firstly, companies might not give high importance to this issue and will not spend enough money on this task as profitability is their main goal. So, we will not get the desired result. Secondly, there will be some kind of disagreement as to the proportion of the cost spent by each company because not all companies produce the equal amount of garbage. These all issues will result in mismanagement.
Government can handle the task effectively and efficiently as they have administrative power and can work strictly and neutrally for the betterment of the whole country. Rather than shifting the full burden to the private companies, high amount of tax and fine should be imposed on the companies which produce a large volume of garbage. In this way, government can cover the cost of cleaning the pollution.
In conclusion, private industries can take responsibility for cleaning the waste in the form of giving the high amount of tax. But the main control should be in the hand of the government for better, effective and neutral management.
- Market share (in percentage) of different notebook manufacturers in 2006 and 2007. 73
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free?Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or not? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, as to, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28762541806 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07896907401 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501672240803 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3002884365 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235461015647 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804030379325 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874214452977 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145896527727 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767959044737 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.