Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationship. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technological advances have revolutionized the way people socialize on a regular basis. However, many lament for its unfavorable impacts on social relationships. I disagree with this thinking despite acknowledging the reason behind it.
Granted, opponents of advanced communication may argue that it lacks face-to-face interactions needed for a solid relationship. As modern digital applications proliferate, people tend to rely on them, potentially leading to deteriorated bonds. However, this perspective fails to factor in the fact that most, if not all, people might not decide to spend such a large amount of time just communicating online, rendering this worry almost unnecessary. Sophisticated communication, more often than not, serves more as a powerful vehicle for expression than as a problem.
The argument in favor of modern communication is further strengthened by its convenience in conveying information. This enables people to communicate with each other, irrespective of geographical barriers. It manifests itself starkly in the COVID-19 pandemic, when people had to isolate themselves from the outside environment so as not to contract such a fatal disease, making the use of the internet a only yet most effective method of socializing with others. Moreover, even in today’s modern world, the benefits of online communication are still palpable. For example, people do not need to travel long distances to meet their partners directly, serving as a testament to how powerful this advancement can be in our lives.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for opposing online communication, I would contend that it can yield certain benefits, given its convenience in socialization. However, it is also crucial to balance between virtual and reality, ensuring it is a boon to people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationship To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarize the information by selecting and report 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun lament seems to be countable; consider using: 'many laments'.
Suggestion: many laments
... socialize on a regular basis. However, many lament for its unfavorable impacts on social r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ation, more often than not, serves more as a powerful vehicle for expression than ...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...disease, making the use of the internet a only yet most effective method of socia...
^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od of socializing with others. Moreover, even in today’s modern world, the benefi...
^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ication are still palpable. For example, people do not need to travel long distan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62408759124 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38202248409 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671532846715 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4478634451 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205852169639 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656807430329 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468941773161 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112542894416 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774834411015 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.