some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often believed that increases in tax imposed on countless industries will contribute to reduced pollution. Others, myself included, assert that there are superior solutions, which could be implemented instead.
Granted, proponents of levying higher tax on industries may argue that waste released from production of many companies is the primary culprit behind various types of pollution such as air, pollution, water, contamination, or polluted soil, among others. Increased tax, therefore, can act as a deterrent to companies, potentially deterring them from continuing to do so. However, it is important to note that only businesses that engender pollution should be forced to pay higher tax and it would be unfair for others, which hardly pollute the environment and even benefit it such as renewable energy, sustainable practices, or eco-friendly technologies fields, were this approach universally adopted.
On the other hand, I side with those who advocate other viable solutions that can be applied to alleviate pollution. First, the onus should be placed on the government to incentivize industries that have exerted positive impacts on minimizing pollution caused by manufacturing. These incentives may include providing subsidies, widely spreading their good work, or granting them with priorities required for a thriving business. Encouragement aside, the states should also give punishments to companies that adversely impacted the environment such as depriving them of opportunities to expand and thrive or impose more stringent regulations regarding the way they function, ensuring that they will change their businesses towards more environment-friendly and positive styles.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for advocating increasing tax on a large number of industries, I would contend that other better methods can come in handy, including both encouragement and punishment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-19 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-16 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-16 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-16 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Andi Irwan Nur | 80 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarize the information by selecting and report 84
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ations for advocating increasing tax on a large number of industries, I would contend that other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8256227758 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21110047678 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661921708185 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.3784870549 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.7 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200039634228 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775737200086 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773367368446 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123442397107 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391227305556 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.15 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.