Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether new forms of communication, which are made possible by modern technology, are having side effects on the quality of our relationships or are just improving them. I completely agree with the first opinion due to several reasons that I will discuss in greater detail in my essay.
It is widely believed that modern technology has improved our lives in many aspects, particularly, the way we communicate. Since the advent of the cellphone and the smartphone, we have immediate access to the internet and its infinite possibilities, including, for example, the instant messaging system. this improvement made possible for people to communicate faster and further, and we can continue to keep in touch with long-distance friends and distant family members. E-mails and web conference calls are frequently used in companies to run businesses overseas. The advantages of modern technology are not a limited number.
On the other hand, the drawbacks leave people confused about their opinion on this topic, including myself. The improvement in the speed of communication has created a sense of impatience in everyone, which is not a good trait. People were used to waiting for days, even months, before getting a response letter back but modern society seems to not know what waiting means. One good illustration of this is the sense of anticipation we get even before pressing the "send" button on our smartphone. What happens if the other person does not send a message back immediately? We start to feel nervous. Instant messaging has made us more controlling and demanding.
To conclude, I believe that the advantages brought about by modern communication technology have helped our society to progress quite impressively, but those improvements did not better the quality of our relationships. Hence, I am inclined to the opinion that those technologies have a negative effect on our social life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... example, the instant messaging system. this improvement made possible for people to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28025477707 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10619774656 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589171974522 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1219687373 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206203852063 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601404971484 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630255653508 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126042767917 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677814164427 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.