Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Many work for a long day or a night with a negligible amount of time to spend on recreational activities. This essay will argue that despite there being the benefit of getting paid while working over-time, some dangers of getting health issues and resulting in burn-out far outweighs any advantage.
People who work long periods can give a boost to their income. Employees work for extra hours that they can manage their financial budget without any hurdles, and could also stash cash on savings. For example, when I was in Yemen at the age of 24, it was the first time I did over-time with greater enthusiasm because I had added 25% extra to my income, but I became exhausted and fell sick for a week. However, all over-time personnel does not need to be like this, and if taking regular breaks by considering wellness would be beneficial.
Regular duty staff with enough quality time for leisure can possess lots of advantages such as have a healthy well-being, could have a great time with loved ones, and be a success in their career. Having a natural flow of work helps to keep the brain and body with a healthy balance. For instance, research in Japan among the IT people who worked on standard hours shows various benefits such as a reduced level of stress, increased productivity, and happier engaged employees.
In conclusion, having time for recreation and living a better lifestyle far outweigh the supposed advantage of getting an armful of money.
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages 61
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest 67
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages 61
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress What do you think are the causes of this can you suggest some possible solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun work seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many works'.
Suggestion: Many works
Many work for a long day or a night with a neglig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r-time with greater enthusiasm because I had added 25% extra to my income, but I ...
^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
.... For instance, research in Japan among the IT people who worked on standard hours sho...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
...nstance, research in Japan among the IT people who worked on standard hours shows vari...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivity, and happier engaged employees. In conclusion, having time for recreatio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82936507937 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56888898206 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.022494729 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.7 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262471833402 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103300222713 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347279259597 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154011292866 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224402810909 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.