In many workplaces, online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays being familiar with online applications such as the Microsoft teams or Zoom, is just as important as knowing how to read and write. Although in business environments people prefer more and more to work remotely and avoid physical contact with their colleagues, there are those who consider this a negative development. For me, the answer to this dilemma is not a straightforward task.
What makes online cooperation appealing to most professionals is the flexibility which it offers. For example, if there is a need to host a meeting, you can now meet with your peers or a client through the internet, discuss your day to day matters, and even give a presentation online. In this way, you can save a lot of time time, and money relating to transportation and traveling. Furthermore, enterprises and organizations also benefit from this trend due to the fact that it is now much easier to conduct business with entities and clients who are based abroad who you have never met before in person.
On the other hand, many employees believe that the disadvantages of this trend far exceed its benefits. More specifically, lots of people can not perform to the maximum of their capabilities, when they work from their homes. Human interaction is an important factor to keep an employee functioning and focused. Also, many people feel trapped in their homes, and seek an opportunity to escape, visit their workplace and chat with their colleagues. Despite these negative aspects of online communication, people should not stop familiarizing themselves with any new online application that could help them work from their homes.
In conclusion, I believe that working and cooperating online has much to offer and should at all times be preferred by businesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | raspreet singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | xuanhieu26 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-08 | Nguyen Le Hung | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-08 | Bhimani Nick | 63 | view |
| 2020-11-25 | nigora@ | 76 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree 89
- It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The pictures show the changes of a park from 1980 to the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: time
...ine. In this way, you can save a lot of time time, and money relating to transportation a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10689655172 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97098333449 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0561779515 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114790699516 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041609995898 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269836087723 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648113459305 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247882221462 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.