The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors, singers or footballers. They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In modern technology society, the media plays a vital role in people’s lives as it is a tool to update the latest news to everyone. However, there is an opinion that the media’s attention focuses too much on news related to the lives of famous people and suggests that the media should have more reporting papers about ordinary people. Personally, I strongly disagree with this statement.
First of all, personal privacy is a fundamental right of citizens. They are the ones who have the right to decide whether their personal lives should be published on social networks or not. There is a story reported by a journalist about an ordinary man who saved a child from falling from the 2nd floor of a building. It should have been a story that was praised by everyone. However, there are a lot of different opinions appearing on social platforms. Some said that he was lucky enough to catch the girl; others asked what would have happened if the man failed. These negative comments had disturbed the private lives of the one in the reported story. In addition, superstars are used to having their names appear in the newspapers as a part of their popularity, while normal people have no desire or preparation for their names to be known by the public.
Another reason why journalists should write about celebrities more than the average person is the financial benefits from the fame that famous people bring to the economy. When a media company reports on a celebrity, people's attention level on that article will be higher. The company can profit from the shares or clicks from readers and viewers, or even increase sales if the company can cover the products that influencers are using. Furthermore, due to the good reputation that celebrities have, they can call for charity from benefactors to help people in difficult circumstances. For example, Miss H’Henie is reported a lot on social media about her several charity funds and attracting a range of inhabitants to join to help people in need.
In conclusion, the news about celebrities can be more beneficial for either the media or the society than those of normal people.
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shop online 84
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 73
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of their popularity, while normal people have no desire or preparation for their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89835164835 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63527132056 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1150959679 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.882352941 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234663584655 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715613544121 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630894226084 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148407482865 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637911651346 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.