The media should limit how much bad news they report because it discourages people from doing activities which usually involve very little risk.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The negative information is increasingly popular in contemporary society. While I agree that social networks encourage people to do risky activities in a few aspects, I would argue that the media should not limit what they tell us.
There are several reasons why I believe that social media should limit bad news. Firstly, it may have a negative impact on readers such as it can affect their mental health by making them frightened. As a result, it influences their behaviour then they do not do it anymore. For example, some findings about the high crime rates in urban areas or plane crashes make the traveler feel anxious then they decide not to travel anymore, so this can lead to the reduction in economic growth. Secondly, bad information also can manipulate children. This can cause bad behaviours in them such as becoming rude or disrespectful to other people or it can make them always think in a pessimistic way.
However, I firmly convinced that the bad news should not be limited by the media. People have to decide and filter the news before they read it then they should take responsibility for what news they have read. Beside, for the safety of children's souls, the government or parents should caution them for not reading the negative information. Another reason why social networks should not do that is because they have a duty in providing full news for citizens to help them know what is happening and they can avoid doing it.
In conclusion, although I agree that bad information should be limited by the media because of a few reasons such as it can have a negative impact on readers, I am strongly convinced that social media should not do that because people should know and avoid bad news. It is recommended that the government should give the fine for extremely negative articles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-17 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | Trinh Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | Kha Nguyen | 83 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 67
- In some countries most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buying them What are the advantages and disadvantages of renting a home 67
- The media should limit how much bad news they report because it discourages people from doing activities which usually involve very little risk To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The pie chart below shows the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pessimistic way" with adverb for "pessimistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...people or it can make them always think in a pessimistic way. However, I firmly convinced that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59933328578 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.02831821 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295905347581 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115269924617 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992883962372 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2130933374 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508515150924 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.