In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion.
` 1
Some argue that the way we live in industrialization is increasingly affected by the advance of technology such as working, shopping, or communicating, which leads to the lack of face-to-face interaction with other people. Personally, I believe this negative trend affects our life in many ways.
To begin with, the development of the internet provides us with many benefits of shopping. Compared to the past, we used to purchase some products by checking out directly shops, malls. While we merely surf the internet and click buttons so that thanks to delivery services, our orders will be delivered to home in later hours, thus saving time for us to complete other tasks. In addition to this, the advance of technology also contributes positively to our communication nowadays through social networks. Facebook, for instance, is the most common online tool on the internet, which allows us to interact with other friends wherever we are as long as we have smartphones. In this way, we have more chances of broadening our social relationship, which is one of the key contributors to our success in the fiercely competitive world.
On the other hand, more people addict to the internet can bring drawbacks to our daily life. Besides establishing new relationships, it also creates an invisible gap between us because of their most of the time using these applications on smartphones. Especially when children immerse themselves in virtual life such as Facebook, it is likely to create a generation gap between family members. One of the typical examples is the lack of family meals in the modern city, which leads to some arguments regularly. Furthermore, because of spending the most time on using the internet, people tend to face many public healths such as obesity, high level of stress.
In conclusion, for many reasons I have mentioned above, I once again reaffirm my position that the tendency of using the internet will cause adverse effects on our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in Australia, divided into three categorises, from 2001 -2008 73
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 61
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Australia between 1995 and 2005. 78
- : International travel is becoming cheaper and cheaper, and more countries are now opening their doors to foreign visitors. Do you think that the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
' 1 Some argue that the way we live in in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10153846154 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93828271707 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0836982226 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18693744967 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637874983447 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623116523629 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108089980165 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047475962533 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.