In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work, and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
Due to the breakthrough development of the Internet and technology in the present-day world, people can easily do anything online, from shopping, studying, working to meeting with people. While many people support this form of communication, others, including me, partially believe that every development has two sides.
On the one hand, since online interaction is fast and free, it offers people extremely convenient services. Specifically, people now can access all kinds of websites with one click, satisfying their desire to work or communicate with other people. Also, connecting with people via the Internet would considerably expand their networking as they can meet new friends from all over the world much simpler than ever before. Besides, online meetings offer people chances to keep in touch with their family and friends when they are away from home, for instance, studying abroad. Moreover, in some special cases, in which face-to-face interaction is impossible, like in the Covid-19 pandemic, the Internet plays a crucial role, allowing people to continue their work and study in isolated time.
On the other hand, a number of people argue that if one spends too much time interacting with people via online platforms, they will soon have several problems with their communication skills. In this case, they may easily lose attention to their real relationships and even underrated face-to-face meetings - a prominent way of enhancing the connection between people. Also, many people have some problems when it comes to real interactions, like feeling scared of talking to people in person. For example, many surveys have found that children find it difficult to make friends when coming back to school after the Covid-19 is under control. Furthermore, humans can become more inactive. As online services offer them a convenient way to interact with the world, people may lose interest in going out and having real conversations, which has negative effects on their relationships and their physical health.
In conclusion, although online interaction has contributed many benefits to humans’ life, people have to use it wisely and take control of their online work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The diagram shows the process of making orange juice 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd even underrated face-to-face meetings - a prominent way of enhancing the conne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79153871917 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0273569871 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27672803895 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097902591948 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672859133595 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166083167208 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727144705678 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.