Since money for postgraduate research is limited, some people think financial
support from the government should be only provided for scientific research
rather than for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
With the limited financial aids, some people argued that governments should subside more practical subjects about postgraduate learning. While there are several positive effects provided by supporting scientific research, I believe that continue explore in some other aspect like art and music are necessary as well.
It is easy to understand the directly profit made by supporting scientific research. On the individual level, it can be argued that directions like computer science, mechanical engineering and other practical scientific researches can provide a higher salaries, career progression, job opportunities, and therefore lead a better life for who take them. On the society level, more financial assistant put in scientific realm just means more original inventions, which can bring higher efficiency to the industrial production and act as a positive feedback system. In this case, the development of the nation will be accelerated and standing on the world level more confidently.
It is also noticeable that some fields except from scientific field are crucial too. For example, when we human being meet the basic survival needs like foods and garments, people will pursue a superior needs like ‘self-actual’ or ‘beauty’ instead according to the Maslow’s hierarchy theory. Pursuing in music and art realms are more likely to chase more superior target as human natural. Also, it is possible for job employers to value some skills like imagination above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we need to invest more in the non-scientific domain.
In conclusion, although it seems sensible for governments give more financial focus on scientific researches, I personally believe that other fields like art or music should be equally treated.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- the surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievement of its rules, artists or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 66
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- "Despite its downtown location, the Rialto Movie Theater, a local institution for five decades, must make big changes or close its doors forever. It should follow the example of the new Apex Theater in the mall outside of town(1). When the Apex opene 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64598540146 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17447764641 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5494381236 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.916666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185687595379 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699836480865 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438969041561 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124058980847 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194708757411 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.