The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on
vital public services such as schools and hospitals.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Governments in some countries spend large amounts of money on space exploration
programs. I completely agree with the idea that these are a waste of money, and that
the funds should be allocated to public services.
There are several reasons why space programs should be abandoned. Firstly, it is
extremely expensive to train scientists and other staff involved with space missions, and
facilities and equipment also come at a huge cost to the government. Secondly, these
programs do not benefit normal people in our daily lives; they are simply vanity projects
for politicians. Finally, many missions to space fail completely, and the smallest
technological error can cost astronauts their lives. The Challenger space shuttle disaster
showed us that space travel is extremely dangerous, and in my opinion it is not worth the
risk.
I believe that the money from space programs should go to vital public services instead.
It is much cheaper to train doctors, teachers, police and other public service workers than
it is to train astronauts or the scientists and engineers who work on space exploration
projects. Furthermore, public servants do jobs that have a positive impact on every
member of society. For example, we all use schools, hospitals and roads, and we all need
the security that the police provide. If governments reallocated the money spent on space
travel and research, many thousands of people could be lifted out of poverty or given a
better quality of life.
In conclusion, my view is that governments should spend money on services that benefit
all members of society, and it is wrong to waste resources on projects that do not improve
our everyday lives.

Votes
Average: 3.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-01 Linhdung 61 view
2023-07-29 Huyenchi 67 view
2022-12-25 muzair.1409 73 view
2022-09-20 damn999 61 view
2022-06-29 aikzat 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge amounts of money on space exploration programs I completely agree with the ide...
^^^
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that these are a waste of money and that the funds should be allocated to public ...
^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ograms should be abandoned Firstly it is extremely expensive to train scientists ...
^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r staff involved with space missions and facilities and equipment also come at a ...
^^^
Line 6, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge cost to the government Secondly these programs do not benefit normal people in...
^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly lives they are simply vanity projects for politicians Finally many missions to...
^^^
Line 8, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o space fail completely and the smallest technological error can cost astronauts ...
^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es The Challenger space shuttle disaster showed us that space travel is extremely...
^^^
Line 10, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us and in my opinion it is not worth the risk I believe that the money from spac...
^^^
Line 12, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould go to vital public services instead It is much cheaper to train doctors teac...
^^^
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce and other public service workers than it is to train astronauts or the scienti...
^^^
Line 14, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... engineers who work on space exploration projects Furthermore public servants do ...
^^^
Line 15, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obs that have a positive impact on every member of society For example we all use...
^^^
Line 16, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ools hospitals and roads and we all need the security that the police provide If ...
^^^
Line 17, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts reallocated the money spent on space travel and research many thousands of pe...
^^^
Line 18, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be lifted out of poverty or given a better quality of life In conclusion my...
^^^
Line 20, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld spend money on services that benefit all members of society and it is wrong t...
^^^
Line 21, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esources on projects that do not improve our everyday lives
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61382465725 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534545454545 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 275.0 20.2975951904 1355% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1410.0 106.682146367 1322% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 275.0 20.7667163134 1324% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 111.0 7.06120827912 1572% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 18.0 5.01903807615 359% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277137787491 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.277137787491 0.084324248473 329% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775860484075 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564103612001 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 140.2 13.0946893788 1071% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -207.65 50.2224549098 -413% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 110.5 11.3001002004 978% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.95 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.78 8.58950901804 242% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 112.0 10.1190380762 1107% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 111.0 10.7795591182 1030% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.